It was a perfect Charles Dickens moment…A Tale of Two Kings and a third one demonstrating from afar who actually wears the crown .
By the time the plates were cleared, the evening had been neatly explained. Dickensian, as many said—ticking a box.
A grand table, a hint of disorder, two very different men doing exactly what one expected.
Charles the Third throwing George Bernard Shaw like meaningful yet piercing barbs in full British glory , and at the end of it , the host , a man desperately waiting and wanting to crown himself , having to accept in a confused way , of all things, a bell from a WW2 maritime vessel bearing his name ,with the offer that he may ring it anytime he needs help from across The Pond , making the circle complete .
The saving grace was the First Lady , in the structured Dior gown which , as observed by a keen social media observer , faintly resembled the Greek Winged VICTORY of Samothrace , auguring a good omen , in the Shade of pink worn by her very elegant predecessor , Jaqueline Kennedy , both the women masters of soft power politics .
Dickens offers a familiar comfort.
He holds the shine and the unease in the same frame.
No need to resolve anything—you just notice the friction and move on.
Charles III held his pace and place,
measured, unhurried, his cadences delivering the point with wit .
Donald Trump on the other hand —the man who would be king—offered only the immediate, the upfront, the kinetic , in the strange linguistic style unique to him .
The contrast required no staging.
But the real tension wasn’t between the monarch and the populist —- it was in the silence between them.
While they navigated the protocol, the third player , also with an Inherited Crown —the one who holds the world’s real levers—was watching from the Gulf.
Just as the applause began to die down, the news arrived like a slow-moving shockwave— a significant OPEC recalibration, signaled from Riyadh.
It was a move that rendered the dinner’s fine rhetoric suddenly fragile.
In a world where the crowned and the aspirants vie for the spotlight, the true authority is increasingly claimed by those who control the energy flow.
The Gulf’s timing was not an accident — it was a reminder that while the West masters the art of the state banquet, the East is busy rewriting the ledger.
In Dickens’ novels, the system always grinds toward a conclusion, however messy.
Here, the system is increasingly irrelevant to the outcome.
We are seeing a pivot from a world of traditional statecraft to one of ruthless, commodity-based pragmatism.
Nothing went wrong at the table. It was all performed with exquisite precision . The Lilac flowers flooding the tabletops , the Garden Vegetable Veloute not garlicky, as British Royalty demands , and not withstanding the flag gaffe , sweetened at the end by honey from the First Lady’s aviaries .
But as the evening drew to a close, it was clear that the centre of gravity had shifted. The applause was polite, deserved, and—in its own way—entirely peripheral.
The banquet was an elegant performance, but it simply didn’t cover the cost of the fuel.
The world now watches with anxiety and bated breaths .
Disclaimer
Views expressed above are the author’s own.
END OF ARTICLE
